I’M A HOOKER AND PROUD OF IT!
What’s that you say? The scandal! The horror! Read on as the long time Silhouette Special Edition author and three time RITA nominee bares all for fearless TGTBTU readers.
CHRISTINE RIMMER CONFESSES: I’M A HOOKER AND PROUD OF IT
Oh, well, no. Not that kind of hooker. But I did get your attention, now, didn’t I?
So I hear it’s Silhouette Special Edition month here at TGTBTU. How wonderful is that? Extremely. I’m so pleased to be invited to contribute the celebration.
I suppose a little introduction wouldn’t hurt. I’m Christine Rimmer and I’ve been writing for SSE for a very long time. I have about seventy published contemporary romances to my credit and fifty or so of those stories came out in Special Edition. Though I’ve written for other lines and imprints, I always seem to come back to Specials. The line suits my voice and writing style perfectly.
I love to write about families, and SSEs are often stories about women finding love while dealing with any number of family issues. Love that. Love writing that. Love stories about finding family, and many of my stories feature the “finding family” theme.
I also love taking a secondary character from one book and making him a hero in his own story. I do that a lot. With heroes and heroines. I’ve written three miniseries of my own in SSE: The Jones Gang, The Bravo Family stories and a contemporary Viking series, Viking Brides. The Bravo Family saga, my most successful series which has come out under three different miniseries titles, is twenty-three books long now, and counting. I’m just setting out to write a whole new branch of the Bravo family that will be ten books long-seven brothers, two sisters. And a Latina half-sister they don’t yet know they have.
And about being a hooker…
By that I mean, I love writing the most popular “hooks.” Yes, it’s true. Some may scoff at the classic romance plots. Not I. Secret babies, fake engagements, babies found on doorsteps, pregnant heroines, bosses and secretaries falling in love, marriages of convenience…you name the classic romance convention and chances are I’ve written a story based on it, most likely more than one. I love reinventing a classic plot every time I do it.
As Karen Templeton already said so perfectly, SSE focuses on stories of real women finding love in a world that might exist right down the block. The heroes can be beta, they can be the guy next-door. They don’t have to be macho tycoons or ranchers or sheiks-but it’s way more than all right if they are. That, to me, is the best thing about SSE. As long as it could happen in what most of us think as “real” contemporary life, hey, you will find it in SSE. And even the “reality” parameter is occasionally stretched. I wrote three contemporary Viking stories in SSE. I created an imaginary Viking country where the Norse ways still held sway. And one of my earlier SSE heroines had psychic powers. So even the “real people in the real world” rule can be stretched. And sometimes broken.
And then there’s the sex. In SSE, if the story doesn’t require a full-out consummated love scene-there won’t be one. Of course, such a thing would never happen in one of my books. After seventy books, I still adore creating a hot, character-driven love scene. Or ten.
In SSE, there’s a whole lot to love. If you haven’t given Special Edition a try yet, I hope you’ll take the plunge.
Questions? Requests? Advice? I love to chat. My internet provider is not being nice lately, but Sybil will help me respond to your comments.
Visit me at my website, www.christinerimmer.com or my blog, http://christinerimmer.blogspot.com/ or on Myspace, http://www.myspace.com/christinerimmer
LOL Christine – the title of this post was definitely a “hook” – great post. I love the SSE line too!
Hmmm…you got me thinking about hooks. What are my favorite hooks, the ones that seem to rope me in every time? Reunited lovers, friends to lovers, adversaries to lovers…and a plot that seems to be associated with the latter two. I call it the accidental pregnancy plot, but I don’t know if that’s what its really called. You know the one, where two folks succumb to passion, then find themselves expecting. And they fall in love while dealing with the pregnancy.
Is there a name for that hook?
Writing one of those right now, Devon. I just call it “Thea’s story,” but that might not mean much to anybody except me and my editor. 😉
“Accidental pregnancy” might work — because you know the couple’s going to fall in love, anyway.
I’ve already visited this theme twice, because it’s such a fave with readers.
And here somebody thought KNOCKED UP was such a fresh idea, LOLOL!
Christine Rimmer’s server does not like TGTBTU, so here are her responses–
Limecello: Well, the hooker thing….le sigh. I am, I am. And I’m so pleased you enjoy SSE. The line’s attractions are many.
Devon: Love the accidental pregnancy. I think I’ve done like ten of those. My October book will be one: HAVING TANNER BRAVO’S BABY. I always have fun figuring out where the slip-up was for each particular couple, as I’m way big on them always using contraception. Lotsa fun with condoms in my books! Maybe too much. LOL
Karen T: Another interesting thing about series is the titles always go way literal. If you want evocative, go ST! So Accidental Pregnancy is the perfect title for an accidental pregnancy book–although I do believe it’s already been used in SSE….darn! In series, readers do want to know what classic plot they’re getting. And they also want to be surprised at how we, as authors deliver the plot to make it fresh again. I think of it as relating to what Robert McKee wrote in his great book on screenwriting. “We give the audience the experience we’ve promised, just not in the way it expects. This is what separates artist from amateur.”
Last year I read “Accidentally Expecting” That’s pretty close.
Full out love scenes are always appreciated, but not necessary.
I have to say that I’ve several of your books on my TBR pile. I am a proud owner of several older SSE continuity series.
I love the hooks that SSEs give. Great stories lines and no the characters don’t always have to be alpha.