REVIEW: Mistress For a Month by Ann Major

July 31, 2008

book cover Limecello's review of Mistress For a Month by Ann Major
Contemporary romance published by Silhouette on 1 May 08

Ann Major is an author I'm unsure about, but tend to like. Thus far, her books are hit or miss for me, but when she hits, they're spot on. This was one such book. It's typical of any other Silhouette Desire in some ways, yet completely different, and very well written. Read more

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Recent Loves (and Re-Loves)

July 31, 2008

These are just some things I thought of off the top of my head.

ice cream maker Ice cream. Ok, the better question would be, when have I not loved it? But I have a greater appreciation for it now that I have my own ice cream maker. I got a lovely Cuisinart for my birthday, but making ice cream is *hard* - anyone have a suggestion or good recipes? My goal is to make amazing creations that taste like Jeni's Ice Cream, or the delicious Argentinian gelato you get at Dolce Zza.
S'mores. I've missed out on the past few cookouts/barbecue's... but I caved and made s'mores in the toaster oven yesterday. They were still delicious. Maybe not quite as fun as sitting around a smoky fire making them, but good nonetheless. And bug free. I think I'm growing up though :( because I had 4 [eep yes, I did.] 2 with chocolate, and 2 without, and I found the ones with chocolate too sweet. Gah! s'mores
cous cous Cous cous. I haven't had it in a long long time, and found myself craving some. This terrific little store at home sells boxes of it for 99¢, and my favorite is the Roasted Garlic with Olive Oil. Yum. The Parmesan didn't wow me, and I'm about to try the Toasted Pine Nut soon.
pesto Pesto. This goes more with the first - the best pesto I've had in my life was at a country club on Long Island, at a cousin's wedding. Amazing. The best ciabatta and pesto I've had was at a place that no longer seems to exist in NYC on the way to the UN building. It's been years, and I still want a sandwich there. I recently bought myself a mini food processor. I've wanted one for years (all I need now is a Kitchenaid stand mixer) - and mine is EENSY. Still, the pesto I made was just a tad bit off - but good. Just not AMAZING. Any suggestions or recipes? And/or suggestions on what I can use a food processor for? food processor
history channel
Surviving History. I've never been big on the History channel, but while surfing the boob tube one day, I was hooked. [I make little notes that I'm watching the show too - just ask the duckies.] It's... so fascinating! I love history. Such a history buff/geek - which is partly why I love historicals. [I'm not too in depth on history so it's perfect.] It's interesting I love this show so much because I'm so anti blood, guts and gore. Well, not so much anti as I can't handle it. I'm the girl sitting in the theater with her hands in front of her face, cringing away from the screen. Yup. It's a fascinating show though, and I love how they recreate things, and put so much attention to detail. I like it a lot more than Mythbusters, because I feel the latter isn't quite as meticulous. [So I'm a bit OCD too. Whatever.] I also love Surviving History because it's in one of the best cities - Columbus, Ohio! Where my Buckeyes at?
Walking. I live in suburbia, so nobody walks. Well, I also live on a main road in my city, so from my driveway to the road is 40 mph - it's a bit like real life frogger crossing it. I've taken to walking to the library - it's a bit more than 2 miles - definitely doable. I get some funny looks walking because nobody does. At certain points, if there's no sidewalk, drivers turn stupid. They swerve at me, or drive on the entire other side of the road to avoid me (which I prefer more than the former) - but it's funny. We don't know what to do with pedestrians. One day I'm going to ponder about how there are no outdoor activities for teens [outside of organized/school sports] - and how sad that is. walking shoes
planet earth Nature shows. I grew up watching National Geographic specials, wanting to be a marine biologist. Somewhere, I lost that dream. (And that's probably a good thing because AP Chem was not my best friend. That and somehow I've managed to avoid ever taking physics, through more than 18 years of school.) Last week, however, I caught Nature, on PBS, and squee'd my way through the ~55 minute program. I figure I can add working with some sort of nature organization some time as a career goal. (But I can't see myself going for another degree and taking biochem and molgen, etc.) Ah well. I've recently been watching more of Planet Earth, though I was spoiled when I got to see it at a friend's who had a home theater, with the most amazing sound system and HD. National Geographic
olympic logo
THE OLYMPICS! I love the Olympics. Something in me just goes "EEEE" at the thought. Of course, this year I have some qualms and don't know if I'll watch the opening ceremonies... but then what does it matter if little 'ol me does or doesn't watch it? [But then...] So I don't know. It makes me sad how a lot of American athletes choose not to go to the Olympics because they can make more money doing other things, or they just think they're TOO amazing to go - one result being the 04 "Dream Team"? Embarrassing. Also, China is going to bring it. [I won't even go into my issues. Although - one - the food pumped full of steroids. What are the countries that can't afford to import their food do? They're going to be disqualified! Or... is that China's strategy? And dolphin suits... Grr.]

Recently I've been a watering pot. Seriously. I never cry. Ever. Not even during Titanic [and that's before it became something of a joke.] Or funerals (generally). But... now, commercials can make me blubber. Well, choke up at least. This being one of the top. Anyway, I have at least one friend competing in the Olympics, so GO TEAM USA!

 

(And I still can't watch that without my eyes welling up. If you don't know what happened, his hamstring tore. So he's not American. Still - it's my favorite Olympics commercial, and holy ow.)

So anyway - what are your recent "yay" discoveries, or, what have you "re-discovered" that you're very happy about?

Tags: ,

Betcha Contest Info

July 31, 2008

this will make my ramble a lil bit shorter... the following was 1st apart of THIS POST. Enter contest by commenting on THIS POST or THIS POST

Read more

Tags: ,

REVIEW: Hot Mama by Jennifer Estep

July 31, 2008

Book CoverLiviania's review of Hot Mama (Bigtime #2) by Jennifer Estep
Paranormal romance release by Berkley 6 Nov 07, re-release 5 Aug 08

Immediately after finishing and loving Karma Girl, I instantly delved into the next Bigtime story. Estep kept me up way past my bedtime. Both books are fast paced, well plotted, and impossible (for me) to put down. [Ed.: float your cursor over the cover to the left to see the original cover.] Read more

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Why I’m not at Nationals

July 30, 2008

lynnec.jpg

by Lynne Connolly

Since Syb has done her bit, I thought I’d add my mite.

Main reason—expense. I live in the UK, so I can only afford one US conference a year. So I go to RT. Lots of reasons for that—more below.

I’m not a member of the RWA. I belong to the RNA (the UK Romantic Novelists’ Association). I was a member of the RWA, but I didn’t get enough out of it. Only because I live abroad. If I lived in the US, hell yeah, I’d be a member. Even though the RWA has snubbed me twice, and my fellow authors. It’s not personal. But first, ebooks aren’t good enough for them. If you write ebooks, you don’t count. You can, by earning $1000 join PRO, and I do that with most of my releases, but before that stipulation, it used to be by publisher. Secondly, they don’t like writers of erotic romance. My paranormals are of the erotic variety. I’d still be a member, though.

I get a great deal from the RNA, the local chapters and the national conference (which was earlier this month and was totally awesome). Unlike the RWA, you only have to be published by a royalty or advance paying publisher, and to contribute nothing towards publication to join. And there’s the totally awesome New Writers scheme, where unpublished members can present a full manuscript to the RNA and get it critiqued. If the RNA thinks it’s good enough, they’ll even submit it to a suitable publisher for you.

Anyway, back to the RWA. My main reason for visiting the USA is to promote my books, and catch up with friends. I wish it could be different, I wish I earned Rowling-money so I could visit when I wanted, but I can’t. And Romantic Times is far better at the reader-meets-author thing. It really is. They have two big signings during the conference and many readers come to party with the authors and publishers and booksellers. That conference has done a lot to further my career. I’ve met people who have helped me, and I’ve been able to meet people face to face. Although I’m not the greatest socialiser in the world (most writers aren’t) I do need to get away from the laptop from time to time.

The RWA conference looks like a blast, and I have a friend who’s popped over to give it a whirl. Others have visited, and one day I’ll go. Just to see what it’s like. And oh, San Francisco! I’ve never been, and I’d love to go. And at Nationals, Mary Jo Putney might not have stopped me in the lift because she recognised me. Oh wow, I squeed all the way to my room. Sorry, I was so ultra-cool when I met her, but I still squeed later.

Lynne Connolly

syb note: I will enter comments here into the 'betcha contest' too

Tags: , ,

REVIEW: Innocent as Sin by Elizabeth Lowell

July 30, 2008

Book CoverConnie's review of Innocent As Sin by Elizabeth Lowell
Contemporary romantic suspense hardcover release by William Morrow 19 Jun 07
Massmarket paperback release by Avon 29 Apr 08 (book links to mmppb)

Contemporary romantic suspense often walks a fine line between the various elements that make them up. How to be contemporary without overloading on technical details. How to be romantic without sacrificing the suspense. How to be suspenseful without sacrificing the romance. This book didn't do such a good balancing job. Read more

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Review: The Bad Boys Guide to the Galaxy by Karen Kelley

July 30, 2008

book cover LauraJ's review of The Bad Boys Guide to the Galaxy by Karen Kelley
Contemporary Romantic Comedy released by Brava on 1 Jul 08

I picked up the first book in this series, Close Encounters of the Sexy Kind, based on the title alone. I read the back of the cover and immediately purchased the book. After I finished it I had to know if there would be more and I was so happy and exited to find out that there would. It seemed like forever but Cosmic Sex (book 2) finally came out. Fortunately, I didn’t have to wait quite as long or at least it didn’t seem like it for Bad Boys. But no matter what the wait is for these books, it’s well worth it. Read more

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Contest: 3 times the Awesome with Liz Carlyle, a Rake and Romance(s) CLOSED

July 30, 2008

Never Romance a Rake, the final book in Liz Carlyle's latest trilogy, was released on 22 July 2008. We know that Sybil loved it, and by clicking on that link, you can read a great excerpt as well.

Baron Rothewell lives a dark, shuttered existence by day, and a life of reckless abandon by night. Scarred by a childhood filled with torment and deprivation, Rothewell cares very little anyone or anything. His life on the edge of ruin suits him—until he meets a man who just might be his nemesis. The Comte de Valigny likes to play deeply and dangerously, but Rothewell’s recklessness is undeterred. Until one night when de Valigny wagers something just a little more valuable than gold.

Mademoiselle Marchand is a desperate woman in a strange land, and her pleading eyes seem to swallow Lord Rothewell body and soul—assuming he still has one. Now the baron must play his hand with the utmost care, for at last something meaningful is at stake . . .

In honor of (to quote Sybil) "the historical of the summer", TGTBTU presents...
Read more

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Betcha Think This Post is About You

July 30, 2008

Sybil

a.k.a. My unpopular opinion/Tis about me not you

a.k.a. I will share anyway cuz I rawk like that, a.k.a. this is so in sybilish you might want to stop reading NOW for fear of brain damage/migraine, a.k.a. gwen isn't going to edit this into English (but will hopefully fix spelling & add links-HINT), a.k.a. I am prolly not even going to edit it (RUN), a.k.a. this shit is long and you aren't gonna read it but I can point to it from now on when asked /end warnings

Otherwise known as the answer to...

Why Sybil isn't in San Fran @ RWA's Conference

(in 3 parts)
sybilPART IYou may or may not know but I went to RWA Dallas Conference last year. Why did I go? Well there were 2 huge ass big reasons I wanted to go:

  1. There were things I wanted to do for the blog that I thought the conference would help since I had decided to shift TGTBTU from a sole reader bitch board to more of a review blog.
  2. It was in Texas.

Easy whore be thy name sybil. ::shrug::

Now many a person has asked me if I would be in San Fran this year and I made the decision a while ago not to go. You have NO idea how happy that makes me because I wouldn't be able to go @ this point in time (crappy shit here) and it would blow big ass chunks if I had signed up and paid. And I DO plan to go next year... so why didn't I go this year? You don't care you say? HA! I am gonna tells you anyway...

Last year was FAB. I had the best time and was able to do tons I wanted to for the blog. I was sharing a room with Jane of Dear Author, who I was lucky enough to have helping me with the blog at the time because we were both in something of the same place of changing a mind set of what we wanted to do with our blogs vs. what we first started with. (It is her post here that made me think "coolio I can post about this in public".)

I asked her, at the time last year, if she would mind more roommates, selfish reasons mind you cuz I had no clue how much much this was gonna cost me and a 4-way split rocks more than a 2-way. What? Sybsisnottehlawyerbabe. Who did I want to invite - again had a thought and selfish motive behind it (almost EVERYTHING I do does - yes, the blog has changed but it is still all about me me me to a point and my interest - I suck like that).

KristieJ had (at the time) recently lost her husband, had her first vacation trip in a while cancel on her and I often heard say - one day I am going to write a book. RWA is for writers. Are they all published? NOPE. Do you HAVE to be a member to publish? Nope. But I think many a person can say RWA helped them greatly move from wanna-be-someday-writer to published STAR! So all those factors made me say a flippant comment to KristieJ one day about joining our 'lil RWA-Blogger-Train.

I was going, Jane of Dear Author was going, and the SmartBitches, so I knew/thought/assumed (in syb's IKNOWALLFASHION) that KristieJ wouldn't feel left out. I had seriously hoped she would go to some of the workshops and it might push her to write that someday book. Yes people, sybs is a buzy body. I suck like that too sorry.

Once she signed onto the lurvetrain, I also stuck my nose into biz and contacted a friend I knew KristieJ would die to meet. Why? Because I could, have no issue with being told "no" (HA! I made myself giggle - really I hate being told no - it irks me but if by friends I get over it ;) ). I forget what Wendy said/posted/emailed/blogged that made me again say a flippant 'come to Dallas'. Her response, IIRC, "Were you serious?"

I emailed Jane "Am I serious?" and she shrugged [while no doubt thinking "goddamnit sybil stop putting so many people in the room". I am a pushy lil duck - sort of. As Gwen sez, one must learn to tell Sybil "NO" or she will have you doing WAY more shit than you can. This is true. OCD be thy name and a lesson Gwen learned the hard way *eg* yes and I ramble but I like to think of it as 'SIDENOTE'.] Long story short (too late) Jane was all sure, fine, whatever....

Why did I think Wendy should go? (Yes, once again there was reason behind my madness.) At the time THE WENDY was not at all apart of TGTBTU, her blog isn't (wasn't?) anything other than a reader blog. Of course, it is one of THE reader blogs, as in we all would not be here without Rosario, Wendy and McVane (a.k.a. THE Maili) (who I so hope touches base someday or at least fucking tells me what the fuck name she is posting under these days). And I, selfishly (yes, yes, yes I am - I admit it - I know I shouldn't - too lazy/seenoreason/amnotstoopid, a.k.a. why hide the obvious), wanted to meet THE WENDY (oddly I had no designs to put her to work at TGTBTU @ that time, came later ;) ) but I was thinking she should go cuz of her job. It would be fab for us, the romance reader, even RWA sees that as they have a day just FOR the wendy's of the world.

And BAM! our room was born (at least in my mind who the hell knows what they were thinking).

sybPART II

Some point during the conference I started to think "FUCK we are presenting this wrong..." because so many reader bloggers started to make noise about coming next year (this year) and I said so to Jane... who I think/thought (might-still-I-haven't-asked) I was being my normal vain self and was saying "le gasp we won't be TEH SPECIAL anymore" and she was of the mindset that any and all readers should be welcome. We are paying so have just as much right to be there.

I didn't agree. (Jane and I OFTEN disagree, her coolness with that was always the thing I luv.) I think the highest of INTERNET MEDIA. I think if you are a blog that reports on the industry, does things to promote romance or aim too, you should be there if you can be.

My thought is the RWA Conference is not a fan event. The book signing, yes - the rest, not so much. I don't see how having 'star gawkers' wouldn't be distracting for authors. And most of all, holy hell, it is expensive, so it doesn't make sense in my head as a fan get together. And I don't get that type of 'fangrrlish behavior' that would make people travel just to meet THEIR FAVORITE AUTHORS EVAH. (I am not saying any reader blogger there is there for these reasons - haven't asked - don't know.)

Again... I AM NOT SAYING ANY READER AT THE CONFERENCE IS A BAD PERSON. I AM NOT SAYING THEY ARE DOING THE WRONG THING. I am not even saying they will cause a problem. I have seen MANY authors be all for them being there but in my normal selfish way IF there is fall out from having reader blogger there (with no author aspirations or a blog that is geared toward reporting on the Romance Industry), I didn't want to be guilty by association. See? All about me...

Dear Author and Smart Bitches (in my 'lil no one agrees with me opinion) SHOULD BE THERE. In my mind they are JUST as much members of the press as any fucking one else. And THAT is why I am still so not amused RWA said they weren't (for all I know that has changed by now, couldn't say). But this is the first year (I think) fans have gone in such numbers, so I don't think RWA has/had a way to qualify who would be 'internet press'. And maybe they got stars in their eyes and saw coin. Not sure... I plan to follow up with them after the conference. Again that is NOT a dig at RWA, as I think the organization, while flawed, RAWKS SOCKS. They do a fucking fab thing for romance writers.

So what do I mean?

A perfect example is katiebabs (co-blogger with the fab KristieJ), when she first said she was going, I thought she was going as a reader fan. When the ever smart LLB saw the window to have her report for All About Romance, and I think Katiebabs works for All About Romance in a publisher contact way once she stopped reviewing for them. Again I think - could be wrong - too lazy to check... So iIMHO (just me) Katiebabs now SHOULD be there as she was 'internet press'.

Does that make sense as to what I was thinking? If not... situation normal *g*.

But the RWA Conference in my 'lil mind is for writers (published or would-bes) NOT a fan event. Jane's thought was I over think shit (I do), readers belong everywhere, their money spends just as well, you are no better than anyone else sybil (which wasn't my point) and other thoughts I forget now.

So when we got back, Jane was allllllllllllll over planning for the next one. Jane is THE awesome and so organized it is sick. I? Not so much. And you may have noticed I tend to take on too much, over think (see above), distract EASY and can't make a decision to save my fucking life. So when she started making plans in AUG 2007 for this year... ::dies:: I was like "you are on crack."

None of this is secret ;). But my unease grew with more and more reader bloggers deciding to go. And, le sigh, I felt guilt because I am like that and thought we might have presented it in a star gawker way. Jane did a lot of twittering and reporting. I did mostly behind the scenes stuff, setting up guest days, contests, making contacts and pimping out the Romantic Advances (le sigh, again, another post which makes me ashamed). That means you, our reader here @ TGTBTU [HA! as if anyone is still reading this ramble] didn't see why I was there so maybe I looked like a star gawker?

I went back and forth... there were things I wanted to do for the blog and I thought again "I should go..." "omg! san fran fucking coolio..." "omg! san fran too expensive for me to invest in a hobby blog..." and then RWA made their decision that unless an Internet outlet was tied to a MAJOR print or TV media they couldn't apply for a press pass.

I have made no secret I HATE that decision (working on coming out of my shell and saying what I think - how I doing?) not because it means "no press pass for sybils" but because the volume of traffic in that thinking doesn't compute. Tell me I can't go because my numbers are not good enough. Tell me you don't think TGTBTU does anything for the Romance Industry. Even tell me you I don't belong, so if I want to go I have to pony up cash. DO NOT tell me I don't 'count' because I am just internet media.

I have, and still will, argue that Smart Bitches and Dear Author reach more readers than what stoopidlyy counts as 'true press'. Again, I know... most, if not all, don't agree with me. ::shrug::

So that sealed the deal for me. In my mind, RWA told me Internet doesn't count. Might not have been their point but that is what I heard. I hate being told "no" without an intelligent reason and saying "gosh a year isn't enough time to figure out how to understand (or attempt to figure out) how to measure traffic" smacks of greed, laziness and I thought a clear message of "readers not wanted".

And most of all I am a bad, bad, bad, suckyass fan. I admit that... I am NOT a good fangrrl. I can love an author to pieces and still not like a book they write. Ask me my opinion - regardless if I think you want it, agree with it or if it will piss you off - ask, I tell. Hell, don't ask and I tell. Blogger be thy name.

evolcats.jpgPART III (a.k.a. syb gets to her point - sort of)

So what do I think now, for those of you seriously bored and still here *g*.

  1. I still don't think the RWA Conference (as I saw it last year) is worth the coin for readers to go.
  2. I have NO clue if they [the readers] will prove to be a distraction to the point of the conference for writers, and if they do, I think that is bad, bad, bad, bad for them to be there. Cuz I am greedy and I want the conference to be for writers so they can write me nifty books to read.
  3. I LOVE the idea of a reader blogger event with authors cuz I think that idea rocks socks. Someone should make that happen.
  4. I plan to try and attend one of the 'reader' events in 2009. Haven't decided which one... either RAW or Lori Foster's thing... unless something else comes up and that could be a possible too *g*
  5. I think if RWA wants the conference to welcome readers they should do things to include them and make it interesting for us on that level. Gwen had a nifty thought on this I think but I forget it [Gwen: it was to do what ComiCon did - have a concurrent "Alternative Media Expo" in the same hall or a meeting room where bloggers, etc., could get face time with whomever attends the conference]. Cuz tis too much money to spend to just hang at the bar and/or meet up with other bloggers. Of course, that is just my general opinion, if you have that money to blow and/or that is your want AND RWA/authors wants us there, rock on with your badself.

TGTBTU will have a few odds and ends on the conference (which, correct me if I am wrong, but that is a different word than convention - and if this was the RWA Convention I would have completely different thoughts on this). Sandy is a wanna be author, who will one day write THAT book. And I hope to hell she reports on some of the workshops she goes too. I think that is interesting from a reader stand point, but as a reader, wouldn't want to attend unless I planned to blog about it. I think (as I have said) RWA is for her. And, like KristieJ, I HOPE it pushes her to start and finish that book that is in her. Do I know if either will be good? Nope - but I think if you wanna you should try. Wendy is going to a dinner for me and I will be reporting on all things Harlequinish that go down. Her other blogs on the conference will be at her blog (I think).

Everything else - I would point you to Dear Author, Smart Bitches and All About Romance. And most likely if you are a reader - you know that *g*.

So as an author or reader, tell me why you disagree with me, tell me what changes (if any) you would like to see at the RWA Conference, tell me what your dream convention is and what you would like have planned as events, tell me you agree with me (cuz hey I would love at least one person *g*), tell me you think the RWA Conference is useless for writers or readers, tell me whatever you wanna...

CONTEST INFO MOVED HERE - will close contest at end of this week Sunday August 10, 2008.

Tags: , , , , ,

DUCK FLASH: A Gathering of Authors

July 30, 2008

DuckFlashThis just in...

Romance Writers of America's 28th Annual National Conference is about to kick off in California. Authors, readers, publishers, agents, just to name a few, will be gathering in the city by the bay, San Francisco, starting today, July 30, through Sunday, August 2, at the Marriott Hotel at Union Square.

Read more

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Next Page »