Tags: , , ,

ducklings1.jpgA while back I discovered many of you see C grades differently than we do here. I thought it was a very interesting discussion and was reminded of it while reading the 60+ comments (from mostly authors) on that thread over there.

As normal most of the authors say they don’t mind ‘reviews’ and as much as they dislike the ‘bad’ ones they understand them. They hate the ‘mean’ ones, the ‘personal’ ones, the ones with ‘agendas’ or where the reviewer is ‘out to get the author’. And many a person say they didn’t do ‘bad’ reviews because why bother.

I have often said I end up buying more books off ‘bad’ grades than A++++ ones. I tend to like many a plot that is played out for tons of romance readers because really I have only been reading romance for about 3 or 4 years. So I for one WANT all reviews, even the ones I don’t agree with. And that lead me to thinking of a book I reviewed once a upon a time, which got me wondering if I see “C” grades in a way many don’t…. what about the “F”s?

What makes a book an “F” for you? If you are an author, do you see “F” differently in your work than you do a book you read for pleasure? If you are a reviewers (be it a website, blog, amazon, newspaper or whatever), is your ‘reviewer F’ ever different than your ‘personal F’?

Is there anything that causes an auto F effect for you in a book but you would forgive if a favorite author did it? What is it? Who would it be? I admit I go into a Diana Palmer novel expecting and forgiving plot points or character traits I wouldn’t in most other authors. Elizabeth Lowell can use nicknames, really silly ones, over and over in her older (amazing) novels and I love them. I don’t expect Julie Garwood to be historically accurate (who knew she did) so I go with the flow.

Things that could be book killers in new to me authors are nothing by those I love. Is that style, voice or a literary comfort blankie?

So tell us…. what F’s you of?