I had something happen recently that’s irritated the heck out of me, so I thought I’d share it, and also hope it helps rid me of the ire and disappointment that’s been brought about.
Before I get into the real meat of this Pondering, I want to give you just a little of my background, because it will have a bearing on this “issue” later.
I have a BS in English, with a minor in journalism – definitely remember that little tidbit. I am a retired Certified Shorthand Reporter for the State of California. Translation: I was a court reporter and reported depositions and arbitrations after administering oaths to tell the truth to a few thousand people for just shy of twenty-five years. One of my hobbies is genealogy. About a year ago my friend Di – our own Dinca here at The Pond – introduced me to Ancestry.com and Family Tree Maker, and the rest, as they say, is history. I’m now addicted, and I’ve had a blast researching my family. That new interest led me to the History and Genealogy Room at the Tulare Public Library in Tulare, California, where I currently volunteer two days a week.
Now to the issue at hand.
About two weeks ago – a Thursday, to be exact – while in the Genealogy Room, a letter was received concerning a lost Purple Heart, the medal honoring those injured or killed in service to our country, and we were asked to aid in the discovery of any information about the fallen soldier’s family so the medal could be returned. Though our research usually goes in the opposite direction, discovering the past, I happily began gathering clues.
Locating the obituary of PFC Norval A. Monroe, I found a number of surviving family members in 1944 and 1948, when he was buried in Tulare county. Researching further, I discovered his brother had also passed away in 2011, so I obtained that obit, too, now knowing I would find what I was looking for. Thus, that is how I learned PFC Monroe has two nieces and two cousins who still live in the San Joaquin Valley of Central California. With a little more leg work, I got my hands on a phone number for one of his nieces, giving her the news about her uncle’s medal and that it would soon be returned to where it belongs, making sure it was okay to pass along her phone number.
Now let me quote a bit from a news clip from KGET.com, the local television affiliate that is handling this particular story:
“A lost Purple Heart medal is headed back to its rightful owner. It was found in a Tulare pawn shop six years ago. Next week, it will be given to the family of the veteran who earned it.
It’s all thanks to the work of archiving students at Bakersfield High School who tracked down the family in a matter of days.”
There’s also a video of the newscast this printed matter is taken from, which can be seen here.
An archiving student is quoted as saying, “Just his name and that he was in the military, that’s about all I had.” That’s why the Genealogy Room was contacted. That’s why we researched microfilm, printed copies of obituaries, found current phone numbers.
A further quote by the same student, “To track down his family took the longest part of it.”
And then:
“Eventually, the students found Monroe’s niece living in Visalia” [California].
Guess yet what I’m worked up about? Every word of this “report,” even the newscast, makes it sound like these students are the ones who discovered this information, that they “tracked down” the family. What’s happened to give credit where credit is due, for heaven’s sake? What’s happened to basic truth, especially in young folks today? Maybe I should have been around to administer a few oaths.
I’m a former journalist, remember? I know all about the five Ws of journalism and how to impart the truth in journalistic writing. Just the facts, ma’am. I spoke directly with that news reporter just this past week. Thursday, to be exact. I even did more research for her at that time, locating the photo of the headstone that is used in the newscast, something they’d have only by making the journey to the cemetery, but I saved them the trip. That reporter is fully aware of our involvement in this situation. Yet not a word about help from the Genealogy Room. It’s as though we were never contacted.
Am I too harsh calling it a lie? At first I thought so, especially because students are involved. Maybe something was said by one that just didn’t make the final cut. I know they are also aware of our involvement, because I spoke to Ken Hooper, who is also mentioned. He’s the one who wrote the letter to us asking for help. I gave him all the information I found, of course including PFC Monroe’s niece’s phone number. Yes, it’s my assumption he passed the info on, only because he did say he was going to, though to whom, I don’t know. Is misleading a better term to use? Maybe. Either way, it’s wrong.
I was thrilled to have been part of such a happy and momentous occasion. Honored. Now it’s been tainted. I was happy to do it all, the reason I volunteer in the Genealogy Room, which houses the largest genealogical collection in Central California and which has some of the best researchers you’ll find. I’m still learning from them, they and the room deserve the mention. Just based on principle, however, the principle of truth and fairness, this entire report needs a number of revisions, a few added truths.
Awww – that just stinks! BUT – you know how the media work, they could have cut, spliced and diced any mention of your hard work from interviews they were given by the students etc.
I would be annoyed too.
And thrilled that his medal had got back to his family and that you played a BIG part in that 😀
That’s been my thought a time or two, Willa. In talking to that reporter, she did give me some bad info and double checked it only after we went searching in the wrong direction for her, so it kind of makes sense this is her end product. I am definitely thrilled to have been part of this. It’s a terrific feeling. I have talked to the niece, so that tempers the annoyance fact just a little.
I’m a little confused. Did the students ask for your help then take the credit or did the reporter write the letter? If the students didn’t contact you then perhaps they were researching on a parallel track and forwarded the information before you did. Why not write a letter to the news director and explain that you were happy to do all that research, but it would have been nice for the library to have been acknowledged in the report.
No, Kim, their director or whatever the title is contacted me to do this research. And, yes, it’s possible there was simultaneous research going on, but I KNOW they don’t have the resources we have. There is no way they could have found the niece before I did – I found her in one day, and he was thrilled when I gave him the news. The reporter is all after the fact. She knew about our efforts – she was told twice about them, once by the director and once by me. And I just may take your advice about contacting someone at the station!
As a former TV reporter, let me tell you what I think happened – it was a better “backstory” to make it sound as if the kids did it themselves. That reporter knew all about you – she just chose to craft her own story. Think about it from her point of view – there is no “wow” factor in a story about library volunteers tracking someone down. Of course, you know how to do research. But a bunch of high school “whiz kids” doing it? Now THERE’S a story! I am not saying that this is right…I’m just explaining how the media operates.
And doesn’t that say it all. She didn’t choose to REPORT THE story
she just chose to craft her own story.
Sadly, there isn’t much regard for the actual facts in a human interest story like this. A story about teenagers tracking down the family is a ratings grabber. You doing your job – even if it is an important, exciting and hard job! – not so much. Either the reporters had the full story and spun it, or their sources weren’t exactly truthful. That said, congrats on your hard work. I hope you can feel rewarded by it even if you aren’t getting the credit you’re due.
Congratulations on the success of your search for the medal winner’s family! Not only does it rankle that you and the Genealogy Room didn’t get any credit in the TV story, the lack of recognition could be a disadvantage if the public library’s funding were in jeopardy.
That’s all well and good, Liesa, but how about sticking to the truth at least? Craft your story, but be honest about it! It may be more interesting the way you describe it, but it’s not true. I can’t imagine that’s condoned nowadays among journalists, especially in small-town America. We’re not reporting DC politics or Afghanistan. That’s just wrong all the way around.
Thanks, Jennifer. I do feel rewarded and honored, as I said in my Pondering, to have been part of this. I guess it’s going to have to be enough for me to know the truth. Although I did receive a call today from the director I mentioned, asking if I was going to attend the ceremony where the medal would be returned to the family. I would have liked to, but I just can’t afford the gas for the trip. Too bad, because I would have been able to tell the true story to those folks at least!
So very true, B.G. And that’s the reason I haven’t gone any further with this, making a complaint to the station or whatever, I don’t want to bring any negative press to the library, depending on what could happen if things were to perhaps blow up. I realize on the other hand there could be good press, but it’s too risky, in my opinion. It’s been good to share my story this way, lessening the disappointment somewhat.
There is always at least 2 ways to look at this kind of issue, you can get upset about it and raise a fuss, which may or may get you credit or you can remember that you volunteered to be of service and the positive result is enough. For me I have learned to “mostly” let the positive result be enough.
I agree with you, Ken. That’s why I opted for this Pondering instead of saying anything to anyone at the station. Even when they called to see if I could make it to the ceremony, I said nothing but wish I could be there, but I can’t. And I really couldn’t, as much as I would have liked that. So I’m definitely going for the positive result.
((Hugs)) How sad that this reporter “crafted” her story in this fashion and the Truth be damned. Which is why we can’t depend on news media for important info. How can we trust we’re learning facts on anything from politicians to war news if they regularly skew every day info for their own purposes?