One of the accusations frequently leveled at romance books is the amount of tropes we have. Things like secret babies and big misunderstandings. They crop up all over the place, but I’m not totally against them, because when they’re used properly they concentrate the reader on what matters most – the characters involved.
In fact, you could say that if they’re used well, they can add extra insight, because it’s how the characters react to situations that is more important than the situation itself. But all too often the trope is used as an easy way to progress a story, and the characters behave in a predictable and disappointing way.
So what tropes are there? Well, in the Harlequin/Mills and Boon Presents/Modern line (and some M and B Riva books, too), and the Harlequin Desire line, they can be particularly prevalent. It’s one of the reasons I read them, to be honest. You can gauge an author’s skill with how well she can bring the trope alive. Some I will tolerate, some I’m less fond of, but blessed be the author who can bring them all to life and make them seem fresh. I’ll look at one of my unfaves in a little more detail.
The Secret Baby – usually the heroine has a baby that the father of the child doesn’t know about. Usually the father is also the hero of the book, and the story is about them coming to terms with the situation. Not one of my favourites, I have to admit. I can’t get over a couple of things. First, the father has a right to know, unless he’s abusive or dead, and even in the first category, there might be a case for him to know. Second, when there’s a weak, defenceless being involved (no, not the heroine, but the baby), then that being must take priority. So whatever the heroine thinks about the hero, she should tell him. Particularly when she is poor and he is rich. That baby has a right to certain things, and one of them is a comfortable childhood, if at all possible.
I’ve seen this one work, but only rarely. I even wrote one myself, but it wasn’t really a secret baby. Texas Heat has a heroine unable to get hold of the hero. He has good evidence to believe she betrayed him and he has cut himself off from her. But she doesn’t stop trying, even though she thinks he’s a shit. Because of the baby. I’ve seen books where the heroine is living in abject poverty, in a damp and bug-infested slum, and the hero is your rich billionaire, and then she feels resentful when he takes over. Say what? She doesn’t deserve to be in charge of a child, IMO.
That’s why I decided not to review Olivia Gates’ latest, The Sarantos Secret Baby, although I’m a big Gates fan. But although I decided to give it a try, the heroine is a complete idiot and doesn’t deserve the baby. Willfully keeping a baby’s existence from the father, however controlling the father is, isn’t a good basis for the story, and I spent the part of it I did read in complete sympathy with Ari and wondering why he doesn’t just take his baby and leave.
Melanie Milburne’s The Unclaimed Baby is another one. In this one the hero and the heroine both behave badly. She doesn’t tell him about the baby, and when he finds out, he threatens to take the baby away. Bear in mind that the heroine, Bronte, is living in her native country, Australia, and she’s providing well for the baby. He is rich, sure, but that’s all he has going for him. So he makes her believe he can take her baby away using the courts? At that point the book fell apart for me. No, just no. The likely outcome is that the courts would award her custody and a maintenance allowance. There is no believable reason why Bronte should believe Luc and go away with him, except for the contrivance of the story. It’s shorthand, a shortcut to get the H/h together and, for me, anyway, it just doesn’t work. If Bronte is as thick as a brick, then maybe. Or if she has a record of criminal violence, maybe again, but none of that applies. Actually, Bronte is a complete doormat. After their split, he cut off contact with her. Rich people can do that. Changed his contact details, told his people to keep her away kind of thing. When she discovers she’s preggers she tries, but can’t get in touch. And then she apologises to him when he rants at her?
I chose those two books as examples because they are authors I usually enjoy who came unstuck when they started down the secret baby route. In fact, I can’t think of a book offhand that has done it right for me, although I keep reading them. Or DNF’ing them. It seems this is a trope that is fraught with difficulty, but I’m sure there have to be some great ones out there. I think many writers do it for That Scene, where the hero stops short, stares at the baby and sees a miniature of himself (or where he refuses to acknowledge the child). Combined with the Big Misunderstanding, it can be one of the biggest fail tropes ever. So the author who can carry it off is skilled indeed.
Anyone got any great secret baby stories? One where the heroine and the hero behave like adults, the baby isn’t used as a blackmailing device, or a way to force the hero and heroine together, where they actually think about the baby rather than their own selfish needs?
I mostly try and avoid all kinds of baby books but inevitably they do sometimes crop up. I read one yesterday, in fact, which was not a great example of the genre. The problem for me wasn’t so much that she hadn’t told the father, because she had at least tried to do so and if he had half a brain, he could have worked it out from all the money she was spending on nappies on his credit card. But what I did have a problem with was her agreeing to go off with the hero for two weeks leaving her child on the other side of the world.
The good one I would recommend is India Grey’s Her Last Night of Innocence (has some other name in the US). The hero has a serious accident the day after she gets pregnant, gets amnesia, no one but she knows about their relationship and so no matter how hard she tries, she can’t get in contact with him. Letters are returned, phone calls are not put through, she’s not allowed to visit in hospital etc. I thought it was very plausible and a lovely book.
I was going to mention Her Last Night of Innocence but I see Ros beat me to it! I enjoyed it very much (even though I hate secret baby stories!) and both hero and heroine behave like adults.
Mmmm, the secret baby thing generally doesn’t work for me either. One of the few books with it that have worked, was a Brenda Jackson, a Westmoreland maybe? The hero and the heroine have a lovely and impulsive one night stand, then go their separate ways, and then when the heroine realises she’s pregnant, she has no way to contact him, having not really exchanged details. Later on he sees her in a magazine, puts two and two together, and contacts her. Actually, I didn’t really like the book, just bits of it – I’m pretty sure she ends up carrying multiples and if I recall correctly she’s a model and he’s generic bazillionaire. But the realistic handling of the secret baby bit stuck in my head, so props to her.
Actually, seems to me that one-night stands in general could be added to the list of plausible reasons for the secret baby plot, but Harlequin heroines mostly aren’t allowed to be so sex positive. I mean, I know single nights resulting in pregnancy are very common in the Presents genre, but frequently the heroine doesn’t really intend for them to be one nighter – she gets over-whelmed or the hero dumps her after or something. Or she gets amnesia (eyeroll). It’s rare that they actually decide to have a fling just because they want to.
I’ll definitely have to look into the India Grey book! I’ve read some fabulous books by her.
Oh, for me amnesia+secretbaby=WIN!! Seconding the India Gray plus a Lynne Graham from a while back, the title of which escapes me but it does that winning formula brilliantly – I loved it. Has ‘Mistress’ in the title (narrowing it down to the 100s)
@Joanna Chambers … do you mean The Sicilian’s Mistress? I loved that story too.
I’m going to sound terrible, but secret babies was what ran me off Mills and Boon, Harlequin and the like…The whole theme just plain bothers me, since it’s so not right that the father doesn’t know. I don’t care if there was a ‘misunderstanding’ or whatever excuse the author could conjure up…