<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: The Daddy Audition by Cindi Myers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/11/07/review-the-daddy-audition-by-cindi-myers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/11/07/review-the-daddy-audition-by-cindi-myers/</link>
	<description>Reading, Ranting and Reviewing by Readers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:34:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/11/07/review-the-daddy-audition-by-cindi-myers/comment-page-1/#comment-146689</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodbadandunread.com/?p=8015#comment-146689</guid>
		<description>Wendy,
After reading over my review and thinking about it some more, I think I might have graded it a bit high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy,<br />
After reading over my review and thinking about it some more, I think I might have graded it a bit high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/11/07/review-the-daddy-audition-by-cindi-myers/comment-page-1/#comment-146683</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodbadandunread.com/?p=8015#comment-146683</guid>
		<description>I also reviewed this one, and we pretty much felt the same way - although my grade was a C-.  I found Tanya self-absorbed and dense - and I couldn&#039;t for the life of me figure out why Jack spent 10 years pining for her.  It was a disappointing read, especially since I really enjoyed the author&#039;s last book in this series, The Man Most Likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also reviewed this one, and we pretty much felt the same way &#8211; although my grade was a C-.  I found Tanya self-absorbed and dense &#8211; and I couldn&#8217;t for the life of me figure out why Jack spent 10 years pining for her.  It was a disappointing read, especially since I really enjoyed the author&#8217;s last book in this series, The Man Most Likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
