<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: Disrobed and Dishonored by Louise Allen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/06/19/review-disrobed-and-dishonored-by-louise-allen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/06/19/review-disrobed-and-dishonored-by-louise-allen/</link>
	<description>Reading, Ranting and Reviewing by Readers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/06/19/review-disrobed-and-dishonored-by-louise-allen/comment-page-1/#comment-128322</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/06/19/review-disrobed-and-dishonored-by-louise-allen/#comment-128322</guid>
		<description>Kate: I think I&#039;ve reviewed all of them so far, except for the new Terri Brisbin (which I own, but haven&#039;t read yet).  Some of them have worked better for me than others, but so far they&#039;ve all been B or C reads for me.  None of them have been OMG Keeper! or OMG Dreck! for me yet.  

For me the Undones have mostly been a gateway drug.  I like discovering new-to-me authors, but I don&#039;t always want to invest my time, money and energy into reading a full-length novel.  Which is mostly why I&#039;ve become a bit of an Undone ho.  I&#039;m really a sucker for these shorter reads.  Lord help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate: I think I&#8217;ve reviewed all of them so far, except for the new Terri Brisbin (which I own, but haven&#8217;t read yet).  Some of them have worked better for me than others, but so far they&#8217;ve all been B or C reads for me.  None of them have been OMG Keeper! or OMG Dreck! for me yet.  </p>
<p>For me the Undones have mostly been a gateway drug.  I like discovering new-to-me authors, but I don&#8217;t always want to invest my time, money and energy into reading a full-length novel.  Which is mostly why I&#8217;ve become a bit of an Undone ho.  I&#8217;m really a sucker for these shorter reads.  Lord help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/06/19/review-disrobed-and-dishonored-by-louise-allen/comment-page-1/#comment-128321</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodbadandunread.com/2009/06/19/review-disrobed-and-dishonored-by-louise-allen/#comment-128321</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review! I keep having high hopes for these Historical Undones but for the most part have been disappointed. The last one I remember liking was Diane Gaston&#039;s &quot;Unlacing Miss Leigh&quot;... although that could have been because I love Diane Gaston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review! I keep having high hopes for these Historical Undones but for the most part have been disappointed. The last one I remember liking was Diane Gaston&#8217;s &#8220;Unlacing Miss Leigh&#8221;&#8230; although that could have been because I love Diane Gaston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

